Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Aslan Karatsev vs Jack Draper Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Karatsev vs Draper analysis and find out who is favored!
Aslan Karatsev vs Jack Draper Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Karatsev 0 - 0 Draper
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Karatsev has won 47.17% of points on his second serve, while Draper has won 49.81%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Karatsev, in recent form, has won 48.36% of his opponent's second serve points, while Draper has won 51.61%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.43% and 28.95% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Karatsev has saved 57.5% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Draper has saved 62.59% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Karatsev has won 51.43% of matches played (W/L 18/ 17), with Draper winning 65.52% (W/L 38/ 20) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Karatsev has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 156/ 88), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 32% (W/L 6/ 13). Draper has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 76% (W/L 72/ 23), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 45% (W/L 9/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Karatsev has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 52.63% of matches (W/L 10/ 9), where as Draper has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 68% of matches (W/L 17/ 8). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Karatsev has played against opponents with an average rank of 178.91 while Draper has played against players with an average rank of 156.55.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Karatsev has won 63% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Draper has won 47% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Karatsev has converted 36.67% of breakpoint opportunities, and Draper has converted 47.31% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
82
Rank
14
High
30
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
35
Rank
35
High
22
Age
L
Plays
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
Form
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
59% (405-284)
Career Total W/L
69% (202-92)
20% (1-4)
YTD W/L
57% (13-10)
$3,787,005
Career Prize Money
$1,468,300
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Aslan Karatsev | Jack Draper |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 20% (1/4) | 57% (13/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 27% (3/8) | 56% (35/27) |
| Games Win/Loss | 44% (51/64) | 54% (320/269) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 60% (9/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 50% (4/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.11 | 0.56 |
| Aces Total | 6 | 161 |
| DFs per game | 0.41 | 0.21 |
| DFs Total | 23 | 61 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:59:19 | 2:3:43 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 176.2 | 95.78 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (231/390) | 58% (1045/1794) |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (150/231) | 76% (796/1045) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (75/159) | 50% (373/749) |
| BPs Won% Total | 37% (11/30) | 47% (79/167) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (129/352) | 38% (690/1805) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Masters W/L | 33% (1/2) | 38% (3/5) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/2) | 69% (9/4) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 25% (1/4) | 60% (12/20) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/3) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (1/3) | 38% (3/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (1/2) | 45% (5/11) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 73% (15/11) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 27% (15/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (5/1) | 25% (8/2) |
Aslan Karatsev Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Flavio Cobolli
Player
Aslan Karatsev
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
66%
(
48 of
73)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
38 of
73)
74
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tommy Paul
Player
Aslan Karatsev
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
33%
(
22 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
22 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aslan Karatsev
Player
Mackenzie Mcdonald
64%
(
63 of
99)
1st Serve %
70%
(
58 of
83)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
38 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
83)
94
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fabian Marozsan
Player
Aslan Karatsev
68%
(
48 of
71)
1st Serve %
52%
(
48 of
93)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
32%
(
23 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
93)
88
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(6) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Aslan Karatsev
64%
(
49 of
76)
1st Serve %
56%
(
39 of
70)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
29 of
39)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
32 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
70)
71
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 6-7(4) ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Borna Gojo
Player
Aslan Karatsev
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve %
49%
(
27 of
55)
6
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
19 of
27)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Aslan Karatsev
80%
(
40 of
50)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
11 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Aslan Karatsev
Player
Shintaro Mochizuki
58%
(
34 of
59)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
6
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
20 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Aslan Karatsev
Player
Alex De Minaur
62%
(
43 of
69)
1st Serve %
63%
(
30 of
48)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
48)
64
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aslan Karatsev
Player
Zhizhen Zhang
49%
(
24 of
49)
1st Serve %
62%
(
38 of
61)
4
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
96%
(
23 of
24)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
9 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Jack Draper Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Jack Draper
50%
(
35 of
70)
1st Serve %
48%
(
32 of
66)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
40%
(
14 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Borna Coric
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve %
60%
(
43 of
72)
8
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
92%
(
35 of
38)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
8 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
71
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hubert Hurkacz
Player
Jack Draper
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
43%
(
26 of
61)
9
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
20 of
26)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Thanasi Kokkinakis
67%
(
53 of
79)
1st Serve %
68%
(
52 of
77)
6
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
43 of
53)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
43 of
52)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
21 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
20 of
77)
78
Total Points Won
78
|
6-3 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Taylor Fritz
Player
Jack Draper
78%
(
75 of
96)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
92)
18
Aces
10
0
Double Faults
2
80%
(
60 of
75)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
46 of
60)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
24%
(
23 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
28 of
92)
101
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Rudolf Molleker
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
70)
9
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
80%
(
39 of
49)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
21 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
70)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
4-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Vit Kopriva
68%
(
56 of
82)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
82)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
89
Total Points Won
75
|
6-1 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hubert Hurkacz
Player
Jack Draper
67%
(
62 of
93)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
98)
7
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
40 of
59)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
37%
(
34 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
35 of
98)
94
Total Points Won
97
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nicolas Jarry
Player
Jack Draper
66%
(
76 of
115)
1st Serve %
60%
(
77 of
128)
18
Aces
20
6
Double Faults
7
79%
(
60 of
76)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
58 of
77)
38%
(
15 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
35%
(
40 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
48 of
128)
123
Total Points Won
120
|
7-6(5) 4-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Taro Daniel
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
10
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
97%
(
28 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Karatsev Vs Draper Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Jack Draper
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
